The 5 mistakes to avoid when implementing exoskeletons in the workplace

The integration of exoskeletons in industrial environments represents a proactive and effective solution to reduce musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and improve team performance. However, to ensure the project's success, it is essential to adopt a structured approach.

Here are the five most common errors observed during the implementation of exoskeletons and how to avoid them.

1. Choosing an exoskeleton without analyzing actual tasks

A common mistake is selecting an exoskeleton based solely on a technical sheet or a quick demo.
Each position has specific risks: type of effort, frequency, posture, duration, environment, workspace.

Consequence: The exoskeleton does not provide the right support and remains underutilized.

Best practice:

• Conduct a field assessment

• Clearly define the targeted tasks

2. Not involving workers from the beginning

The success of the project relies on user experience.
If workers do not understand the objective or do not feel consulted, resistance to change can be significant.

Consequence: Low adoption and negative perception of the equipment.

Best practice:

• Select “super-users” to test the solutions

• Gather their feedback during the pilot phase

• Incorporate field input into decisions

3. Neglecting training and support

A poorly used exoskeleton cannot offer its full potential.
Even a passive exoskeleton requires training on adjustment, maintenance, and best practices.

Consequence: Discomfort, misuse, risk of accidents.

Best practice:

• Initial training by a specialist

• Clear documentation (guides, videos, etc.)

• Follow-up after a few weeks of use

4. Implementing a large-scale solution too quickly

Moving directly from a demonstration to a global rollout can lead to disappointments:
some roles may not suit or require adjustments.

Consequence: Significant investment with insufficient return.

Best practice:

• Pilot phase of 4 to 12 weeks

• Measure indicators: comfort, fatigue, efficiency, risk reduction

• Adjustments before broad deployment

5. Not monitoring the evolution of needs and performance

A project involving exoskeletons is not a one-time event, but an ongoing process.

Consequence: Gradual abandonment of the equipment and a return to initial constraints.

Best practice:

• Regular follow-up with users

• Reevaluation of risky tasks

• Continuous improvement plan

Conclusion

The implementation of exoskeletons is a sustainable strategy to improve health and performance at work.
Avoiding these five errors ensures a better return on investment, positive adoption by workers, and a measurable reduction in MSDs.

For a successful project, a rigorous, collaborative, and well-structured approach is essential.

Exoskeletons Canada offers comprehensive support

Our team provides:

• Ergonomic assessment of tasks

• Selection of models suited to your needs

• User training and follow-up

• Flexible rental and purchase options

• Support in measuring results

To discuss your objectives or plan a trial in the company:
info@exosquelettescanada.com